<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evaluating the Technological Singularity Concept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardleis.com/2009/05/04/evaluating-the-technological-singularity-concept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardleis.com/2009/05/04/evaluating-the-technological-singularity-concept/</link>
	<description>Personal Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:08:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jef Allbright</title>
		<link>http://richardleis.com/2009/05/04/evaluating-the-technological-singularity-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Jef Allbright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardleis.com/?p=96#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I would agree that an understanding and appreciation of semiosis is perhaps the most detrimental deficit of the typical transhumanist&#039;s toolbox.  It&#039;s essential to an effective grasp of context and uncertainty with regard to meaning and prediction, and it&#039;s central to the relationship between syntax and semantics in artificial intelligence, but due to its apparent &quot;softness&quot;, &quot;vagueness&quot;, and emphasis on epistemic relations rather than ontic  certainty, it is often repugnant to &quot;hard-core rationalists.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree that an understanding and appreciation of semiosis is perhaps the most detrimental deficit of the typical transhumanist&#8217;s toolbox.  It&#8217;s essential to an effective grasp of context and uncertainty with regard to meaning and prediction, and it&#8217;s central to the relationship between syntax and semantics in artificial intelligence, but due to its apparent &#8220;softness&#8221;, &#8220;vagueness&#8221;, and emphasis on epistemic relations rather than ontic  certainty, it is often repugnant to &#8220;hard-core rationalists.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Grayson</title>
		<link>http://richardleis.com/2009/05/04/evaluating-the-technological-singularity-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Grayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 09:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardleis.com/?p=96#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard,

&quot;I am studying, for example, the impact of mass media on education through history...&quot;

Have you read any Umberto Eco? I think you would be very intrigued by his writings on semiotics, and the mass psychology of pop-culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard,</p>
<p>&#8220;I am studying, for example, the impact of mass media on education through history&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Have you read any Umberto Eco? I think you would be very intrigued by his writings on semiotics, and the mass psychology of pop-culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
